In 2007, researchers at the
National Institute of Health[1]
found that “Cortical development in children with ADHD lagged behind that of
typically developing children by several years” (Shaw et al., 2007, p. 19650).
“The prefrontal cortex supports a
host of cognitive functions, such as the ability to suppress inappropriate responses
and thoughts, the executive ‘‘control’’ of attention, evaluation of reward
contingencies, higher-order motor control, and working memory” (Shaw et al.,
2007, p. 19651).
How do the results of this
definitive research affect how educators and parents teach their children with
ADHD and manage their behavior? Should we teach these children according to
their current developmental levels or according to their chronological ages?
I presented to a wonderful group
of teachers at the Goddard School in Yorktown Heights, New York last Friday,
and their questions echoed the concerns of other teaching professionals with
whom I have spoken concerning the results of this research. As I told them,
especially in preschool, in my opinion, educators should try to teach young
children with ADHD according to their developmental levels. Why? If you try to
teach these children according to the milestones that are attributed to their
chronological ages, they will have gaps in their knowledge which will be very difficult
to overcome.
The best strategy is to work
within each child’s learning strengths and preferred learning style, according
to the developmental level that they have reached. Little by little, teach them
to a point where they are challenged but not frustrated. In that way, you will
help these children feel that they are reaching new strides in their learning
at a pace in which they can succeed.
[1] (Shaw, P.,
Eckstrand, K., Sharp, W., Blumenthal, J., Lerch, J. P., Greenstein, D., Clasen,
L., and Evans, A. (2007). Attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder is
characterized by cortical maturation. Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104,
19649–19654. Retrieved from http://www.nimh.nih.gov/science-news/2007/)
No comments:
Post a Comment